Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Healthspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
123
Highlights
40
Differences
7
Reactions
0
Likes
Philips Hearlink 9040
vs
Rexton Reach Rugged :
123 Highlights & 40 Differences —
So, Which Hearing Aid Actually Works Better
Solid design meets high-tech features. Ideal for those needing rugged reliability.
Before you choose your next hearing aid, see how Philips Hearlink 9040 and Rexton Reach Rugged measure up on wearing style, led indicator, carrying case & cable and user experience.
Philips Hearlink 9040 vs Rexton Reach Rugged: Which Behind-the-Ear Hearing Aid Suits You Best?
When it comes to selecting a reliable behind-the-ear hearing aid, both the Philips Hearlink 9040 and the Rexton Reach Rugged offer compelling features tailored to different user needs. Both devices boast modern digital sound processing with effective noise management, supporting Bluetooth connectivity and remote fitting to enhance convenience. However, the Philips delivers a more polished set of premium features, including integrated telecoil support and detailed auditory alerts. In contrast, the Rexton comes at a fraction of the price with rugged durability and practical usability designed for active lifestyles. This comparison explores their main specifications to help you decide which hearing aid aligns better with your priorities.
The Philips Hearlink 9040 stands out as a sleek, compact behind-the-ear solution released in 2023, designed to appeal to users who value high-quality sound and seamless integration with modern technology. With a slim profile, just 0.39 inches wide and 1 inch tall, it fits discreetly and comfortably behind the ear. The device features advanced digital sound processing that includes feedback suppression and wind noise management, vital for natural and clear hearing even in challenging environments. A bonus is the telecoil support, which allows compatibility with loop systems often found in public areas; something the Rexton does not offer.
Connectivity is enhanced by robust Bluetooth integration and app support for intuitive control and personalization. The Philips device includes detailed LED and audio alerts covering power status, battery life, volume changes, and program shifts, giving users comprehensive feedback and control over their hearing experience. Water resistance and salt spray resistance improve durability for daily wear, though the device lacks a shower-safe mode. The charging time of 3.5 hours using a magnetic charger gets you quickly back to full power, though no charging case is provided.
Comfort is also a priority, with support for glasses and masks and availability in four dome sizes to customize fit. With FDA Class II classification and CE marking, it promises quality assurance, although it lacks FDA approval and ISO certification like its competitor. The Philips Hearlink 9040 retails for about $1499.99 at Amazon.com, reflecting its premium positioning.
Tough and Functional: The Rexton Reach Rugged Offers Durability and Value
For those who need a hearing aid that can adapt to a more demanding lifestyle but are budget-conscious, the Rexton Reach Rugged makes a compelling case. Released more recently in 2025, this device is slightly broader at 0.5 inches but remains lightweight at just 10 grams, ensuring comfort during prolonged use. What truly differentiates this model is its rugged build, complete with shower-safe mode and full water resistance, suitable for those active users needing resilience in wet or dusty environments.
The Rexton excels in feedback cancellation, rated as "High," which guarantees a quieter listening environment. Its digital sound processing, directional microphones, and wind noise management match the Philips in core audio functionality. Additionally, this hearing aid supports pairing with up to eight devices, enhancing its versatility in busy technological environments.
Its charging system offers practical advantages: a USB-C port for convenient charging plus a large-capacity 1000mAh charging case capable of multiple recharges on the go, an area where Philips does not provide accessories. Charging time is slightly longer at 4 hours, but well justified by the enhanced portability. The hearing aid fully supports remote fitting using Connexx clinical software, a known standard in audiological care, providing professional adjustment capabilities. However, it lacks a telecoil, which may limit some user scenarios.
While its LED indicators focus on battery and connectivity status, the audio alert types are fewer but cover essentials such as low battery and program changes. For users prioritizing convenience, the comprehensive accessory kit features wax guards, multiple domes, cleaning tools, and even a power adapter. This FDA-approved and ISO-certified device sells at a strikingly affordable price of roughly $50.46 at AliExpress, offering outstanding value for less tech-intensive needs.
Quick Take
The Philips Hearlink 9040 delivers an elegant, feature-rich hearing aid experience with premium audio processing, telecoil support, and detailed user feedback designed for sophisticated users. In contrast, the Rexton Reach Rugged impresses with rugged durability, multi-device pairing, and a large charging case, making it a smart choice for those seeking practicality and affordability without sacrificing core hearing aid functions.
Bottom Line
For those who prioritize advanced technology, sleek design, and comprehensive telecoil compatibility, the Philips Hearlink 9040 stands out as the superior premium option. On the other hand, if affordability, ruggedness, and broad accessory support are more important, especially for everyday toughness and ease of use, the Rexton Reach Rugged is an excellent, budget-friendly contender that doesn't compromise on essential features.
Verdict
Winner: Philips Hearlink 9040 - Best for users looking for advanced audio features, telecoil functionality, and a polished design backed by a reputable brand.
Runner-up: Rexton Reach Rugged - Outstanding value and rugged durability suitable for active lifestyles and budget-conscious buyers.
Both Philips Hearlink 9040 and Rexton Reach Rugged share the Behind the Ear product type, ensuring a similar wearing style and user experience.
Identifies the physical type of the hearing aid.
In the battle of Product Type,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Type on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
66
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Beige, Black, Silver, Brown, Bronze, Warm Gray, Deep Brown
vs
Color Options
The Philips Hearlink 9040 offers 6 color options including Taupe and Dark Grey, whereas the Rexton Reach Rugged provides 7 options such as Silver and Bronze. With a wider color range, Rexton Reach Rugged suits users seeking more style variety.
Available colors for the device housing.
In the battle of Color Options,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Color Options on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
FCC ID
Philips Hearlink 9040 provides FCC ID details (2ACAHAU5MBTEMR/2ACAHAU5MBTEM), while Rexton Reach Rugged does not list an FCC ID. Philips is suited for users needing this regulatory detail.
Certification code for FCC compliance in the US.
Based on community votes for FCC ID,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The model names are Philips Hearlink 9040 and Rexton Reach Rugged respectively, representing their distinct brand identities and design philosophies.
The commercial model identifier of the hearing aid.
In the battle of Model Name,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Name on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Age Group
What is the intended age group?
47
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
Adult
50
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Adult
Philips Hearlink 9040
Designed specifically for adult users, addressing their hearing needs. Not suitable for children or infants.
Rexton Reach Rugged
The hearing aid is designed for adult users, tailored to meet adult hearing needs.
Defines whether the device is designed for adults or children.
In the battle of Age Group,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Age Group on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
What is the country of origin?
92
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
Denmark
90
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Germany
Rexton Reach Rugged
Manufactured in Germany, indicating high engineering standards and quality.
Indicates where the hearing aid was manufactured, which may influence quality, regulations, and consumer trust.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
better than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Intended Use
What is the intended use?
72
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
Mild Loss, Moderate Loss, Severe Loss
75
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Mild Loss, Moderate Loss, Severe Loss
Rexton Reach Rugged
Intended use covers mild to severe hearing loss, ensuring broad user compatibility.
Clarifies the hearing loss range the aid is built for.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Release Year
What is the release year?
92
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
2023
100
Rexton Reach Rugged
1Votes
2025
vs
Release Year
Philips Hearlink 9040 was released in 2023, compared to the more recent Rexton Reach Rugged released in 2025. For those looking for the latest model with possibly newer tech, the Rexton Reach Rugged is preferable.
Year the model was introduced to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
8 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Release Year,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The Rexton Reach Rugged came out more recently in 2025 so it might have more updated features.
See more
Manufacturer Part Number
What is the manufacturer part number?
75
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
HER9042 MNR T R
Who knows?
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Unique part number from manufacturer.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Manufacturer Part Number on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Serial Number
What is the serial number?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Unique serial identifier for tracking.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Serial Number on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Length
What is the warranty length?
2
years
0Votes
5
years
0Votes
Duration of warranty coverage.
In the battle of Warranty Length,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
3.0 years
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Length on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Transferable
Is the warranty transferable?
No
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
No
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Whether warranty can be transferred to new owner.
In the battle of Warranty Transferable,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
same as
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Transferable on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Market Region
What is the market region?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
100
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Global
Identifies the sales or distribution region.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Market Region on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Language Support
What languages are supported?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
69
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
English, Spanish, French, German, 20+ more languages
Languages supported by app or device prompts.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Language Support on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Fitting Range
What is the fitting range?
47
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
Mild to Severe
50
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Mild to Severe
Range of hearing loss the device can accommodate.
In the battle of Fitting Range,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fitting Range on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Insurance Reimbursement Code
What is the insurance reimbursement code?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
10
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
V5261
Code used for insurance or reimbursement claims.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Insurance Reimbursement Code on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Hearlink 9040 measures 0.39 inches in width, smaller than Rexton Reach Rugged's 0.5 inches. The Hearlink 9040 is more compact, appealing to those valuing discreet devices.
The width of the device measured across the side.
In the battle of Width,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
better than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
0.1 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Both devices are equal in height at 1 inch. This indicates similar vertical sizing, making either option comparable in terms of fitting behind the ear.
The vertical height of the device.
In the battle of Height,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
same as
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
equal
1.00 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.01
lbs
0Votes
vs
Weight
Weight info is unavailable for Philips Hearlink 9040 but is 0.01 lbs for Rexton Reach Rugged, indicating Rexton’s very lightweight design which benefits comfort.
The overall weight of the device without packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
70
mm
0Votes
vs
Charging Case Height
Charging case height is not available for Philips Hearlink 9040 but is 70 mm for Rexton Reach Rugged. Rexton provides a tangible case size, helpful for portability considerations.
The vertical measurement of the charging case, useful for portability.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Case Height on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Hearlink 9040 has a depth of 1 inch, whereas Rexton Reach Rugged is notably slimmer at 0.3 inches. The slimmer profile favors Rexton for users prioritizing minimal bulk.
The depth of the device measured front to back.
In the battle of Depth,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
higher
0.7 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
4
inch
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Package width is 4 inches (~10.16 cm), denoting the external dimension of the packaging box.
Width of the product package for shipping and storage.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
2
inch
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Package height is 2 inches (~5.08 cm), indicating the thickness of the packaging.
Height of the product package.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Package Weight
What is the package weight?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.5
lbs
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Package weight is 0.5 lbs (~0.23 kg), reflecting the combined weight of the device and accessories.
Total weight including packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Weight on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Case Width
What is the charging case width?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
40
mm
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Charging case width is 40 mm, compact enough to fit in pockets or small bags easily.
The horizontal measurement of the charging case, important for pocket fit.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Case Width on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Case Depth
What is the charging case depth?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
90
mm
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
The charging case depth measures 90 mm, providing a compact yet practical size for portability and storage.
The front-to-back measurement, affects portability and bulkiness.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Case Depth on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
6
inch
0Votes
Depth of the product package.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Charging time is 3.5 hours for Philips Hearlink 9040 versus 4 hours for Rexton Reach Rugged. Philips charges slightly faster, a practical advantage for quicker device readiness.
Time required to fully recharge the device.
In the battle of Charging Time,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
better than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
0.5 hours
measurement.
Based on community votes for Charging Time,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Neither Philips Hearlink 9040 nor Rexton Reach Rugged have replaceable batteries, so users should expect rechargeable, integrated power solutions in both.
Whether the battery can be replaced by the user.
In the battle of Replaceable Battery,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
same as
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Battery on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
100
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
USB C
vs
Charging Port Type
Philips Hearlink 9040's charging port type is unavailable, but Rexton Reach Rugged uses USB C, offering a modern and convenient charging interface beneficial for compatibility.
The connector type for charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Port Type on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Both Philips Hearlink 9040 and Rexton Reach Rugged support magnetic charger types, facilitating easy and secure charging connections.
Whether the charger uses a magnetic connection.
In the battle of Magnetic Charger Type,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Magnetic Charger Type on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
1,000
mAh
0Votes
vs
Charging Case Battery Capacity
Charging case battery capacity is unavailable for Philips Hearlink 9040, but 1000 mAh for Rexton Reach Rugged, indicating the Rexton offers extended case battery life for on-the-go use.
Energy storage of the charging case.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Case Battery Capacity on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Type
What type of battery does it use?
87
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
Rechargeable
90
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Rechargeable
Philips Hearlink 9040
Saves money and reduces waste compared to disposable batteries. Rechargeable for convenience.
Rexton Reach Rugged
The battery type is rechargeable, allowing repeated use and reducing the need for replacement batteries.
Specifies the type of battery used.
In the battle of Battery Type,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Type on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Chemistry
What is the battery chemistry?
87
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
Lithium Ion
90
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Lithium Ion
Philips Hearlink 9040
Lithium-ion batteries offer long-lasting performance and faster charging.
Rexton Reach Rugged
Battery chemistry is Lithium Ion, widely recognized for high energy density, reliability, and rechargeability.
Chemical composition of the battery.
In the battle of Battery Chemistry,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Chemistry on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Power Save Mode
Does it have a power save mode?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Philips Hearlink 9040
Extends battery life when not in use, maximizing energy efficiency.
Rexton Reach Rugged
Power save mode optimizes battery usage to extend operating time without compromising performance.
Indicates if device reduces energy consumption in idle mode.
In the battle of Power Save Mode,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Save Mode on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
60
mAh
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Battery capacity is 60 mAh, supporting sustained device operation before recharge.
The energy storage capacity of the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Capacity on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Life
What is the battery life?
24
hours
0Votes
32
hours
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Battery life lasts up to 32 hours on a full charge, supporting extended daily use.
Typical operational time on one charge or set of batteries.
In the battle of Battery Life,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
8.0 hours
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Life on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Time
What is the standby time?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
32
hours
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Standby time is 32 hours, reflecting the duration the device can remain powered on with minimal activity.
Duration the device can remain on standby.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Time on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Fast Charging
Does it support fast charging?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Philips Hearlink 9040
Quick charging feature ensures you get more use in a shorter time—ideal for a busy lifestyle.
Indicates if short charging provides hours of use.
In the battle of Fast Charging,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fast Charging on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging
Does it support wireless charging?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
No
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Philips Hearlink 9040
You can charge wirelessly with a compatible charging station, making it even more convenient.
Indicates if the device can charge wirelessly.
In the battle of Wireless Charging,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
better than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
higher
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Case Charge Cycles
How many charge cycles does the case provide?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
20
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
3 full charges
Rexton Reach Rugged
The charging case is capable of delivering 3 full charges, ensuring extended usage without frequent recharging of the case itself.
Number of times the case can recharge devices.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Case Charge Cycles on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Power Consumption
What is the power consumption?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
1.2
mW
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Power consumption is 1.2 milliwatts, indicating efficient energy use beneficial for longer battery life.
Typical power draw during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Efficiency Rating
What is the energy efficiency rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
100
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
A
Rexton Reach Rugged
Energy efficiency rating is A, indicating good power consumption performance.
Energy efficiency classification.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Efficiency Rating on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Low Power Shutoff
Does it have low power shutoff?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Rexton Reach Rugged
Low power shutoff helps protect the battery by turning off the device automatically at critical low power levels.
Shuts down automatically at critically low power.
In the battle of Low Power Shutoff,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low Power Shutoff on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Cycle Life
What is the battery cycle life?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Number of charge cycles before battery degrades.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Cycle Life on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Health Indicator
Does it have a battery health indicator?
No
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Shows battery condition or health status.
In the battle of Battery Health Indicator,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Health Indicator on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Directional microphones are available on both devices, improving speech understanding by focusing on sound direction.
Indicates if microphones focus on speech from one direction.
In the battle of Directional Microphones,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Directional Microphones on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Both services include feedback suppression, enhancing user comfort by reducing annoying audio feedback in various environments.
Prevents whistling or squealing feedback sounds.
In the battle of Feedback Suppression,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Feedback Suppression on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Sound processing is digital for both Philips Hearlink 9040 and Rexton Reach Rugged, ensuring clear and precise audio amplification.
The main type of signal processing.
In the battle of Sound Processing Type,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sound Processing Type on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
100
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
High
vs
Feedback Cancellation Strength
Feedback cancellation strength is not disclosed for Philips Hearlink 9040, while Rexton Reach Rugged provides high strength, making Rexton ideal for users sensitive to audio feedback.
The effectiveness of the feedback cancellation system.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Feedback Cancellation Strength on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Wind noise management is supported by both Philips Hearlink 9040 and Rexton Reach Rugged, beneficial for outdoor users facing windy conditions.
Special processing to reduce wind interference.
In the battle of Wind Noise Management,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wind Noise Management on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Output
What is the maximum output dB SPL?
106
dB
0Votes
130
dB
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
High output suitable for individuals with severe hearing loss, allowing them to hear clearly in a variety of environments.
Rexton Reach Rugged
Maximum output volume is rated at 130 dB, supporting strong amplification for severe hearing loss.
Maximum loudness output of the device.
In the battle of Maximum Output,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
24.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Output on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Peak Gain
What is the peak gain?
36
dB
0Votes
50
dB
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Offers a strong amplification for clearer, louder sound, particularly useful for individuals with moderate to severe hearing loss.
Rexton Reach Rugged
Peak gain capability reaches up to 50 dB, amplifying sounds significantly for improved hearing.
The maximum amplification gain available.
In the battle of Peak Gain,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
14.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Peak Gain on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Range
What is the frequency range?
61
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
100-9400 Hz
72
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
100-8000 Hz
Philips Hearlink 9040
Wide frequency range, providing detailed sound processing for a more natural listening experience, including both low and high sounds.
The span of frequencies the device can reproduce.
In the battle of Frequency Range,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Range on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Input Dynamic Range
What is the input dynamic range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
70
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
20–110 dB SPL
Rexton Reach Rugged
Input dynamic range spans from 20 to 110 dB SPL, accommodating a wide range of sound intensities for clear hearing.
The range of input levels the device can handle.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Dynamic Range on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Sound Pressure Level
What is the maximum SPL?
106
dB
0Votes
130
dB
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Maximum sound pressure level is 130 dB, which defines the loudest sound the device can output without distortion.
The highest SPL the device can reproduce safely.
In the battle of Maximum Sound Pressure Level,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
24.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Sound Pressure Level on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Equivalent Input Noise
What is the equivalent input noise?
17
dB
0Votes
20
dB
0Votes
Self-noise level of the device.
In the battle of Equivalent Input Noise,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
better than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
3.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Equivalent Input Noise on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Total Harmonic Distortion
What is the total harmonic distortion?
2
%
0Votes
3
%
0Votes
Amount of harmonic distortion introduced by the device.
In the battle of Total Harmonic Distortion,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
better than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Total Harmonic Distortion on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Channels Bands
How many channels/bands does it have?
80
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
24
77
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
16 channels
Number of channels or bands for sound processing.
In the battle of Channels Bands,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
better than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Channels Bands on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Noise Reduction Levels
How many noise reduction levels are available?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Noise Reduction Levels on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Sound Compression
Does it have sound compression?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Adjusts loud and soft sounds to a comfortable level.
In the battle of Sound Compression,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sound Compression on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Compression Kneepoints
What are the compression kneepoints?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
45
dB
0Votes
Thresholds where compression changes behavior.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compression Kneepoints on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Output Limiter
Does it include an output limiter?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Limits sound output to safe levels.
In the battle of Output Limiter,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Limiter on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Adaptive Gain Control
Does it have adaptive gain control?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Automatically adjusts gain for different sound levels.
In the battle of Adaptive Gain Control,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adaptive Gain Control on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Volume Adaptation
Does it adapt volume automatically?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Automatically adjusts volume to ambient sounds.
In the battle of Automatic Volume Adaptation,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Volume Adaptation on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Loudness Compensation
Does it have loudness compensation?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Adjusts perceived loudness across frequencies.
In the battle of Loudness Compensation,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Loudness Compensation on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Comfort Gain Setting
Does it have a comfort gain setting?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Adjusts gain for user comfort.
In the battle of Comfort Gain Setting,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Comfort Gain Setting on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Music Mode
Does it include a music mode?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Dedicated sound setting for music listening.
In the battle of Music Mode,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Music Mode on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Speech Enhancement
Does it have speech enhancement?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Improves clarity of speech over background noise.
In the battle of Speech Enhancement,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Speech Enhancement on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Soft Speech Booster
Does it boost soft speech?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Enhances quiet or soft speech audibility.
In the battle of Soft Speech Booster,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Soft Speech Booster on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Focus Mode
Does it have a voice focus mode?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Prioritizes human voice clarity.
In the battle of Voice Focus Mode,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Focus Mode on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Spatial Sound Processing
Does it include spatial sound processing?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Enhances perception of direction and space.
In the battle of Spatial Sound Processing,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Spatial Sound Processing on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Binaural Processing
Does it support binaural processing?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Synchronizes sound processing across both ears.
In the battle of Binaural Processing,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Binaural Processing on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Program Presets,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
better than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
higher
44 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Program Presets on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Real Ear Measurement Compatibility
Is it compatible with real ear measurement?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Indicates if the device can be tested with real ear measurements.
In the battle of Real Ear Measurement Compatibility,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Real Ear Measurement Compatibility on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Hearing Loss Range Support,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
better than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
higher
37 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hearing Loss Range Support on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Receiver Type
What receiver type is used?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
30
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Standard
The type of receiver used in the device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Receiver Type on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Receiver Power Rating
What is the receiver power rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
10
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
S,M,P
The maximum power level of the receiver.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Receiver Power Rating on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility With Hearing Loops
Is it compatible with hearing loops?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
No
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Indicates if the device supports induction loop systems.
In the battle of Compatibility With Hearing Loops,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
better than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
higher
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility With Hearing Loops on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Pediatric Program Modes
Does it include pediatric program modes?
No
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
No
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Special programs designed for children’s needs.
In the battle of Pediatric Program Modes,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
same as
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pediatric Program Modes on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
60
Rexton Reach Rugged
1Votes
8 devices
vs
Device Memory For Pairings
Device memory for pairings is not available for Philips Hearlink 9040, whereas Rexton Reach Rugged supports up to 8 devices, offering more versatility for multiple connections.
Number of devices the hearing aid can remember.
Based on community votes for Device Memory For Pairings,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Both hearing aids utilize Bluetooth wireless protocols, facilitating seamless wireless connectivity with compatible devices.
Lists supported wireless protocols.
In the battle of Wireless Protocols,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Protocols on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Hearlink 9040 supports Telecoil functionality, but Rexton Reach Rugged does not, making Philips a better choice for users in environments with hearing loop systems.
Allows compatibility with induction loop systems.
In the battle of Telecoil,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
better than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
higher
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Telecoil on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Neither Philips Hearlink 9040 nor Rexton Reach Rugged support NFC pairing, so quick tap-to-connect is not available on either.
Supports NFC for quick device pairing.
In the battle of NFC Pairing,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
same as
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
NFC Pairing on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Both Philips Hearlink 9040 and Rexton Reach Rugged support app integration, enhancing user control through mobile devices.
Determines if a companion app is available.
In the battle of App Support,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App Support on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Bluetooth
Does it support Bluetooth?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Philips Hearlink 9040
Offers easy connectivity with smartphones and other Bluetooth devices for streaming audio.
Indicates if Bluetooth is available for wireless connections.
In the battle of Bluetooth,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bluetooth on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Bluetooth Version
What Bluetooth version does it use?
47
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
5.0
70
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
5.2
Rexton Reach Rugged
Bluetooth version 5.2 is utilized, providing enhanced features such as improved energy efficiency and better connection stability compared to earlier versions.
The version of Bluetooth technology used.
In the battle of Bluetooth Version,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
23 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bluetooth Version on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Pairing Range
What is the pairing range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
30
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
10 meters
Rexton Reach Rugged
The pairing range extends up to 10 meters, permitting stable wireless connections within this distance.
Maximum wireless connection distance.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pairing Range on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
LE Audio
Does it support LE Audio?
No
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Indicates support for Low Energy Audio standard.
In the battle of LE Audio,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LE Audio on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Audio Codec
Which audio codecs are supported?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
47
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
ASHA, LC3, BLE
Supported audio codecs for streaming.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Codec on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Direct Audio Input
Does it have direct audio input?
No
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
No
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Allows direct wired audio connection.
In the battle of Direct Audio Input,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
same as
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Direct Audio Input on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Multipoint Connectivity
Does it have multipoint connectivity?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
No
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Allows connection to multiple devices at once.
In the battle of Multipoint Connectivity,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
better than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
higher
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multipoint Connectivity on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Audio Streaming
Does it support audio streaming?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Indicates if direct audio streaming is supported.
In the battle of Audio Streaming,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Streaming on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Simultaneous Streaming Devices
How many devices can stream simultaneously?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
30
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
1 device
Number of devices that can stream at the same time.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Simultaneous Streaming Devices on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Remote Control Compatibility
Is it compatible with remote controls?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Indicates if it works with physical remote controls.
In the battle of Remote Control Compatibility,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remote Control Compatibility on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Remote Microphone Support
Does it support remote microphones?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Compatible with wireless remote microphones.
In the battle of Remote Microphone Support,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remote Microphone Support on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
TV Streamer Compatibility
Is it compatible with TV streamers?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Indicates if it can connect with TV streamers.
In the battle of TV Streamer Compatibility,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
TV Streamer Compatibility on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Accessory Compatibility
What accessories are supported?
84
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
Philips Hearlink AudioClip,Philips Hearlink TV Adapter,Philips Hearlink Remote Control
Compatible accessories like TV streamers or remote mics.
In the battle of Accessory Compatibility,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Accessory Compatibility on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Update Over The Air
Can it update firmware over the air?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Allows wireless firmware updates.
In the battle of Firmware Update Over The Air,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Update Over The Air on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Both Philips Hearlink 9040 and Rexton Reach Rugged have water resist mode, increasing durability and allowing use around moisture safely.
Special mode for light water exposure.
In the battle of Water Resist Mode,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Water Resist Mode on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Ear to ear synchronization is supported by both devices, ensuring sound processing is balanced across ears for a natural listening experience.
Synchronizes settings across both ears.
In the battle of Ear to Ear Synchronization,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ear to Ear Synchronization on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
85
Rexton Reach Rugged
1Votes
Connexx
vs
Clinical Fitting Software Name
Philips Hearlink 9040's clinical fitting software is not specified, while Rexton Reach Rugged uses Connexx, giving Rexton an edge in professional fitting customization.
Name of software used by audiologists for fitting.
Based on community votes for Clinical Fitting Software Name,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Shower safe mode is absent in Philips Hearlink 9040 but present in Rexton Reach Rugged, which benefits users wanting to keep hearing aids on in shower conditions.
Mode designed for safe use in showers.
In the battle of Shower Safe Mode,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shower Safe Mode on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Remote fitting is available on both Philips Hearlink 9040 and Rexton Reach Rugged, allowing convenient adjustments by professionals without office visits.
Allows audiologists to adjust settings remotely.
In the battle of Remote Fitting,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remote Fitting on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Adaptive Directionality
Does it have adaptive directionality?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Philips Hearlink 9040
Automatically adjusts microphone direction to enhance speech understanding in noisy environments.
Adjusts microphone focus dynamically.
In the battle of Adaptive Directionality,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adaptive Directionality on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Find My Hearing Aid
Does it include Find My Hearing Aid?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Philips Hearlink 9040
Helps locate your hearing aid if misplaced, saving you time and frustration.
Helps locate lost hearing aids via app or alert.
In the battle of Find My Hearing Aid,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Find My Hearing Aid on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Program Modes
How many program modes are available?
36
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
4
60
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Automatic,Manual
Number of available listening programs.
In the battle of Program Modes,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
24 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Program Modes on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Program Switching
Does it support automatic program switching?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Switches programs automatically based on environment.
In the battle of Automatic Program Switching,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Program Switching on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Volume Control Type
What type of volume control does it have?
57
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
Button, App
60
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Button, App
Type of volume adjustment control.
In the battle of Volume Control Type,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Volume Control Type on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Push Button Control
Does it include push button control?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Simple manual button for quick control.
In the battle of Push Button Control,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Push Button Control on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Tap Control
Does it support tap control?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Allows control by tapping the hearing aid.
In the battle of Tap Control,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tap Control on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Custom Preset Creation
Can custom presets be created?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Allows users to create custom listening presets.
In the battle of Custom Preset Creation,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Custom Preset Creation on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Silent Mode
Does it have a silent mode?
No
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Puts the device into silent state when needed.
In the battle of Silent Mode,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Silent Mode on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Sound Detection
Does it detect environmental sounds?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Recognizes different environmental sounds.
In the battle of Environmental Sound Detection,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Sound Detection on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Sound Scene Classification
Does it classify sound scenes?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Classifies listening environments for adjustments.
In the battle of Sound Scene Classification,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sound Scene Classification on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Feedback Learning
Does it have feedback learning?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Learns and adapts to reduce feedback over time.
In the battle of Feedback Learning,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Feedback Learning on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
AI Assisted Sound Adjustment
Does it use AI-assisted sound adjustment?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Uses AI to fine-tune sound automatically.
In the battle of AI Assisted Sound Adjustment,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
AI Assisted Sound Adjustment on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Data Logging
Does it support data logging?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Records hearing aid usage and sound environments.
In the battle of Data Logging,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Data Logging on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Alerts
Does it have voice alerts?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Provides spoken alerts for status changes.
In the battle of Voice Alerts,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Alerts on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Tinnitus Masking
Does it have tinnitus masking?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Provides masking sounds to reduce tinnitus perception.
In the battle of Tinnitus Masking,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tinnitus Masking on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Fall Detection
Does it have fall detection?
No
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
No
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Detects falls and can send alerts.
In the battle of Fall Detection,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
same as
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fall Detection on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Activity Tracking
Does it support activity tracking?
No
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
No
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Tracks user’s physical activity like steps.
In the battle of Activity Tracking,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
same as
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Activity Tracking on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Geotagged Program Recall
Does it have geotagged program recall?
No
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Automatically recalls programs based on location.
In the battle of Geotagged Program Recall,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Geotagged Program Recall on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Wearing style is behind-the-ear, which is a popular choice for ease of use and versatility.
Indicates how the hearing aid is worn on or in the ear.
In the battle of Wearing Style,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearing Style on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Shows whether the device remains secure and comfortable while wearing a mask.
In the battle of Mask Compatibility,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mask Compatibility on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates if the device is comfortable enough to wear while resting or sleeping.
In the battle of Sleep-Friendly Design,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
same as
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sleep-Friendly Design on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Wearing Side
Which side is the device worn on?
75
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
Left, Right, Both
67
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Left, Right
Rexton Reach Rugged
The hearing aid can be worn on the left or right ear, accommodating individual hearing needs.
Designates which ear(s) the device is worn on.
In the battle of Wearing Side,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
better than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearing Side on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Retention Type
What retention type does it use?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
50
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Ear Hook
Rexton Reach Rugged
Retention type is an ear hook, which helps keep the hearing aid securely in place during daily activities.
Type of mechanism used to secure the device in place.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Retention Type on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
The type of ear dome tip used for comfort and sound delivery.
In the battle of Dome Type,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
better than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dome Type on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Ear Tip Material
What material are the ear tips made of?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
60
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Silicone
Material of the ear tips that impacts comfort.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ear Tip Material on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Custom Mold
Is there a custom mold option?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Indicates if custom ear molds are available for better fit.
In the battle of Custom Mold,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Custom Mold on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Venting Option
Does it have a venting option?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Indicates if the device has venting to relieve ear pressure.
In the battle of Venting Option,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Venting Option on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Ergonomic Design
Does it have ergonomic design?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Shows whether the device has an ergonomically shaped design for comfort.
In the battle of Ergonomic Design,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ergonomic Design on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Discreet Fit
Does it offer a discreet fit?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Determines whether the design offers discreet wear.
In the battle of Discreet Fit,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Discreet Fit on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Comfort Rating
What is the comfort rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Average comfort score based on reviews or assessments.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Comfort Rating on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Glasses Compatibility
Is it compatible with glasses?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Indicates whether the hearing aid is comfortable when worn with glasses.
In the battle of Glasses Compatibility,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Glasses Compatibility on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Operating temperature minimum is 32 °F (~0 °C), suitable for most indoor environments and moderate outdoor conditions.
Minimum operating temperature supported.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Min,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
higher
9.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Min on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Operating temperature maximum is 104 °F (~40 °C), suitable for everyday indoor and typical outdoor conditions.
Maximum operating temperature supported.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Max,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
same as
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
equal
104.00 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Max on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Dust Protection,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dust Protection on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Salt Spray Resistance,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Salt Spray Resistance on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Height from which the device can survive a drop.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
IP Rating
What is the IP rating?
87
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
IP68
90
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
IP68
Philips Hearlink 9040
The highest level of protection against dust and water immersion, ideal for active users in any environment.
Dust and water resistance level.
In the battle of IP Rating,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
IP Rating on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Min
What is the minimum storage temperature?
-4
°F
0Votes
-4
°F
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Storage temperature minimum is -4 °F (approximately -20 °C), indicating the device can be safely stored at this low temperature.
Minimum safe storage temperature.
In the battle of Storage Temperature Min,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
same as
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
equal
-4.00 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Min on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Max
What is the maximum storage temperature?
86
°F
0Votes
140
°F
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Storage temperature maximum is 140 °F (approximately 60 °C), indicating the device's tolerance to warm storage conditions.
Maximum safe storage temperature.
In the battle of Storage Temperature Max,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
54.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Max on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Humidity Tolerance
What is the humidity tolerance?
93
%
0Votes
100
%
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Humidity tolerance is rated at 100%, meaning the device can withstand very high humidity levels without performance degradation.
Maximum humidity level the device can withstand.
In the battle of Humidity Tolerance,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
7.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Humidity Tolerance on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Repairability Score
What is the repairability score?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
75
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
7/10
Rexton Reach Rugged
The repairability score is 7/10, highlighting good serviceability and ease in repair or maintenance.
Score indicating ease of repair.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Repairability Score on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Average Repair Turnaround
What is the average repair turnaround time?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
7
days
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
The average repair turnaround time is 7 days. This indicates the typical duration required to service or repair the hearing aid.
Average time required for repairs.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Average Repair Turnaround on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Service Network Coverage
What is the service network coverage?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
100
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Global
Rexton Reach Rugged
Service network coverage is global, offering broad access to support and repair services worldwide.
Geographic coverage of service centers.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Service Network Coverage on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Corrosion Resistance
Is it corrosion resistant?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Protection against corrosion from moisture and sweat.
In the battle of Corrosion Resistance,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Corrosion Resistance on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Repair Center Locations
Where are the repair centers located?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
70
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Manufacturer authorized service centers
Specific locations where repairs are performed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Repair Center Locations on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Calibration Certificate
Is a calibration certificate included?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
No
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Confirms device calibration at delivery.
In the battle of Calibration Certificate,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
better than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
higher
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Calibration Certificate on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Shows whether the device has LED lights for status updates.
In the battle of LED Indicator,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicator on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
62
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Battery, Bluetooth, Charging Status
Type of LED feedback provided.
In the battle of LED Indicator Type,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicator Type on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates if the device provides beeps or tones for alerts.
In the battle of Audio Alert,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Alert on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
80
Philips Hearlink 9040
0Votes
Low Battery, Program Change, Connectivity, Volume Change, Power On/Off
90
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Low Battery, Program Change, Connectivity
Types of audio alerts included.
In the battle of Audio Alert Type,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Alert Type on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Voice Prompts,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Prompts on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Vibration Alert
Does it have vibration alerts?
No
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
No
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Indicates if the device vibrates to give alerts.
In the battle of Vibration Alert,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
same as
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Vibration Alert on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Low Battery Warning
Does it have a low battery warning?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Provides a warning when battery is running low.
In the battle of Low Battery Warning,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low Battery Warning on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Connectivity Status Indicator
Does it indicate connectivity status?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Shows if the device indicates Bluetooth or wireless status.
In the battle of Connectivity Status Indicator,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connectivity Status Indicator on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Program Change Indicator
Does it indicate program change?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Notifies the user when the listening program changes.
In the battle of Program Change Indicator,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Program Change Indicator on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Customization
Can the indicators be customized?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Allows customization of alert tones or signals.
In the battle of Indicator Customization,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Customization on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
A protective carrying case for storage and travel.
In the battle of Carrying Case,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carrying Case on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Extra Domes,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Extra Domes on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Cleaning Tools,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cleaning Tools on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Packaging Contents List on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Case
Is a charging case included?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Indicates if a charging case is provided.
In the battle of Charging Case,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Case on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Remote Control
Is a remote control included?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Indicates if a remote control is packaged.
In the battle of Remote Control,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Remote Control on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of FDA Classification,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
FDA Classification on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Shows whether the device meets EU safety and performance standards.
In the battle of CE Marking,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
CE Marking on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
55
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
ISO 13485, ISO 9001
International quality standards achieved.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
ISO Certification on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates if it follows ANSI performance standards.
In the battle of ANSI Standards,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
ANSI Standards on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
IEC Standards
Does it meet IEC standards?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Shows if it meets IEC international safety standards.
In the battle of IEC Standards,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
IEC Standards on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
FCC Compliance
Is it FCC compliant?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Indicates if the device complies with FCC wireless regulations.
In the battle of FCC Compliance,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
FCC Compliance on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
RoHS Compliance
Is it RoHS compliant?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Shows if hazardous substances are restricted in materials.
In the battle of RoHS Compliance,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RoHS Compliance on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
REACH Compliance
Is it REACH compliant?
Yes
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
Yes
0Votes
Rexton Reach Rugged
Determines compliance with EU chemical safety rules.
In the battle of REACH Compliance,
Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉ is
worse than
Rexton Reach Rugged ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
REACH Compliance on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Certification
What environmental certifications does it have?
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Hearlink 9040
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0
Rexton Reach Rugged
0Votes
Other
Lists eco-friendly or sustainability certifications.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Certification on Philips Hearlink 9040 ◉
vs Rexton Reach Rugged ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Comfort Level
How comfortable does this hearing aid feel during daily use?
Very comfortable — Feels natural all day
0Votes
0Votes
Comfortable — Fine for most of the day
0Votes
0Votes
Tolerable — Feels okay for a few hours
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortable — Hard to wear for long periods
0Votes
0Votes
Sound Clarity
How clear and natural is the sound quality with this hearing aid?
Excellent — Very natural and easy to follow
0Votes
0Votes
Good — Clear in most situations
0Votes
0Votes
Fair — Speech is understandable but not sharp
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Voices sound muffled
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How long does the battery last on a single charge or use?
Extra long — Over 30 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Long — 20 to 30 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very short — Under 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Size and Visibility
How discreet is the size and appearance of this hearing aid?
Very discreet — Almost invisible when worn
0Votes
0Votes
Small — Hardly noticeable for most people
0Votes
0Votes
Medium — Noticeable up close
0Votes
0Votes
Bulky — Clearly noticeable
0Votes
0Votes
Ease of Use
How easy is it to set up and operate this hearing aid?
Effortless — Quick and hassle-free every time
0Votes
0Votes
Simple — Straightforward after first setup
0Votes
0Votes
Manageable — Works but requires patience
0Votes
0Votes
Difficult — Takes a lot of effort each time
0Votes
0Votes
Noise and Feedback Control
How well does this hearing aid reduce unwanted noise and feedback?
Excellent — Smooth, no distracting noise
0Votes
0Votes
Good — Mostly quiet with little interference
0Votes
0Votes
Fair — Some noise, but tolerable
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Frequent static or whistling
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable is this hearing aid with regular use?
Very durable — Over 5 years of use
0Votes
0Votes
Strong — Lasts 3 to 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Average — Lasts about 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Fragile — Breaks within 6 months
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How appealing is the design and style of this hearing aid?
Stylish — Sleek and very appealing
0Votes
0Votes
Modern — Clean and nice look
0Votes
0Votes
Plain — Nothing special
0Votes
0Votes
Old-fashioned — Looks outdated
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How would you describe the pricing of this hearing aid?
Great value for money
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive
0Votes
0Votes
Bluetooth and Connectivity
How reliable is the wireless connectivity and streaming function on this hearing aid?
Supermod
Moderator
0
Cartling
15
